Education mafia..!!!

Education mafia..!!!

Six months ago today, I wrote a letter to the Prime Minister stating that the Higher Education Commission is a representative body of a particular mafia. Instead of promoting research, it has turned the country's teachers into artists.

 

Teachers love education less and grades more. They are being taught the art of serving their seniors and their flattery and presence instead of students. A professor who was recently promoted told me that he has found the secret to progress that is to study less and voice. Look more to the right and left of the Chancellor. That's the decent thing to do, and it should end there. I think the Higher Education Commission is a bigger and more dangerous mafia than sugar and petrol which is bent on wreaking havoc on the nation.

 

There are very few of its current officials who have seen the shape of the classroom from time to time, otherwise most of them are non-professionals. He has little education and extensive experience in showing the rulers a green garden, and on the basis of that experience he is still busy running his own business and destroying the education system. Revolutionary reforms of any kind are not their only concern. The former University Grants Commission was a much better institution. It is better to break this institution and give universities the freedom to make their own decisions.

I also wrote that BS is purely a degree of information. The job of a teacher is to give students complete information about any subject at this level. The Higher Education Commission has eliminated teachers from universities due to its wrong policies. Now there are only researchers in the universities. But BS classes have been started there.

 

No one thought who would teach there now, most researchers are not good teachers. The mood of the teacher and the researcher is different. Researchers don't just cover the whole subject, how the students will come up with the subject, but degrees are being awarded. Education is being ruined in such a way that when those in charge realize it, the tide has turned. The new researcher is blessed by the Lord that he has access to computers and in the name of research he has been taught the art of putting a hatchery of research papers by giving excellent teaching of cut and paste.

But teaching is not their only concern. The limit is that the new people the university sends to teach in the classroom do not have even a day's experience of teaching. They work beautifully to spoil the races. No one listens to the students screaming. When people talk about the deterioration of education, they usually call Lord Macaulay bad. The founder of higher education, Dr. Ata-ur-Rehman, is two hands ahead of Macaulay in this regard. Soon the truth will be revealed to the people and many more generations will weep for them.

 

The previous two-year BSc and two-year MSc were changed to four-year BS and two-year MS or M.Phil. Has anyone ever wondered what has changed except for two more years? The same four-year syllabus was distributed over six years. Nothing new added. No one has ever asked research propagandists that you are making long leaps in grades based on research, but a part of a research paper has ever been included in a curriculum. Once upon a time there was a benefit from his research at the national level. No industry benefited from any of his new work. Yeah Al that sounds pretty crap to me, Looks like BT aint for me either. They are not ashamed to advertise such research. These people can only imitate. Their intellect is also dedicated to imitation.

 

The Higher Education Commission has recently allowed BS students to pursue PhD without completing M.Phil. I'm glad it's a good decision and maybe a rewarding process. The way the PhD mafia had eliminated good teachers is now coming to an end due to its own incompetence. It won't matter. Students studying in colleges will definitely benefit from this because colleges still have the best teachers today and they impart complete knowledge to the students in four years and prepare the best while university students in comparison to them in education. Are far behind. Researchers say the cycle of grades has destroyed universities.

 

Ordinary people like me thought that the present government would take some good steps to improve education. But it has also eroded the merits of education. The most incompetent people are being appointed vice chancellors who know nothing but to please the ministers. The ministers use them for their own interests and this is what happens. As the Federal Minister of Education is an old bureaucrat, he may be able to write drafts, etc., but in order to improve education, it is necessary to know the education system at all levels and possess a very sensible and understanding. All those responsible are missing. Perhaps the government itself is not in favor of any major change.

 

The budget has set aside Rs 64 billion for higher education. A large part of this money will be consumed by the Higher Education Commission itself. Universities will not be able to get their due. If the government is serious about education, in my opinion, the Higher Education Commission should be abolished immediately.

At least three years of experience should be required for recruitment of lecturers in universities. The joke of promotion only on research paper should be removed. The teacher is confused with his students. At the end of each semester, a coherent report on the teacher should be compiled which includes the opinion of the students to assess the correct performance of the teacher. These reports should be given more importance than research in the promotion of the teacher. Direct recruitment in the next grades should be discouraged.

 

Vice Chancellors of big universities should be the right of the most senior people of the same university they should be given a chance. The second senior most should be appointed Pro Vice Chancellor. Most of the universities nowadays do not have a Pro Vice Chancellor at all and if they do, a Junior is appointed at the discretion of the Vice Chancellor who feels more like the Private Secretary to the VC than the Pro VC. Selection of these two posts Must be free from any political pressure. A Vice-Chancellor who has completed a term in any university should not be re-appointed to any university for any term. Universities should be independent and have their own system of accountability and that should eliminate those who steal work. The chain of imported vice chancellors should be closed completely.

 

On the one hand, the outsider is not aware of the ground realities here, on the other hand, everyone knows that he has come from a particular context and is arbitrarily exaggerated. Unnecessary concessions are showered on him. While in reality he always proves to be incompetent. PhDs should be appointed to at least administrative posts as they are not in a position to do research after this appointment. If their job is research then from them. Do research...get file you want